But much like accuracy with a firearm, under real world conditions affected by stress, movement, and low light, accuracy suffers under the “dynamic application of technique.” This is why unintentional strikes to the yellow areas and even red areas on the chart happen. See the green areas on the chart above and to the right. Target areas for the trained application of a baton strike are designed to provide a high propensity for control while minimizing the possibility of long term injury to the subject. Once an officer has made a decision to carry a baton, then target areas and power development become important. Yes the lighter, smaller frame, smaller caliber weapon is easier to carry but what if you need to stop a larger, more dangerous threat. It is kind of like the discussion of whether an officer should carry a smaller or larger caliber firearm. The question becomes: how effective are some of these shorter (16 inch) batons that some officer carry? In terms of knockdown power and being able to maintain distance between the officer and the subject, these shorter batons are less desirable and effective. The officer has to be able to comfortably carry the baton on their duty belt so length and weight are issues. To me, what’s more important is the length of the baton. I - both personally and professionally - have always favored the longer (26 inch) and heavier expandable baton.
There have been many discussions over the years to whether a light baton is more effective than a heavier one.
What baton should you carry? Although this is often times decided by your agency, officers are often empowered to decide what version of a certain type of baton that they are authorized to carry.
The question becomes: what kind of baton should you carry and how should you be trained (and re-trained) with your baton? The first part of the equation is pretty easy. If not, they most probably will not be effective. If the officer is properly equipped and trained s/he can be very effective with a baton. Increasing Your Baton’s Effectiveness All three requirements come back to training. The officer must be able to generate enough force to knock down the subject The officer must strike the parts of the body that will create the best muscle dysfunction 3. The officer must have the “right” baton available - usually on their duty belt 2. The truth of the matter is that batons can be very effective in controlling violently resisting subjects but this requires three mandatory components:ġ. How do we insure more successful deployments of the baton? This resulted in the subject grabbing his leg before sitting down on the ground while continuing to hold onto his leg and simply saying “I don’t want to resist anymore.” So here we have one baton failure and one baton success story. The officers at the scene thought they were going to see some martial arts moves when Bob arrived but instead saw Bob draw his baton and use one powerful strike to the subject’s legs. It’s worth noting that he was also claiming to be a black belt. He arrived at a scene where other officers were dealing with a large, strong, verbally resistive subject threatening to beat up any officer who came near him. This was the case of another classic law enforcement Wisconsin incident involving Bob Willis, a nationally-known martial artist and police trainer. The bottom line is that baton strikes can be extremely useful in controlling a violently resisting subject. With the use of the right kind of protective equipment, you can create an unlimited variety of realistic force-on-force scenarios. Where were the baton strikes directed?.The question then and now is how effective are batons, really, for stopping violent subject behavior? The answer is that it depends on the “totality of the circumstances.” Batons were use extensively but without effect. Saito terrorized and battered two officers before additional officers arrived. This is the incident when Ken Paterra and Mr.
#ASP BATON TRAINING BAG PROFESSIONAL#
But the baton remains a primary weapon in the law enforcement officer’s arsenal.ĭuring the early 80s, when I was a newly-certified defensive tactics instructor, we had the infamous Professional Wrestler incident in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Increasing emphasis on the use of electronic control devices (TASER) adds to the controversy. The controversy about the effectiveness of impact weapons (batons) as an effective law enforcement weapon isn’t a new one.
0 kommentar(er)
